Papers with judge model

8 papers
Beyond the Surface: Measuring Self-Preference in LLM Judgments (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods measure self-preference bias by comparing the scores a judge model assigns to its own responses with those assigned to other models.
Approach: They propose to use gold judgments as proxies for the actual quality of responses . they propose to measure self-preference bias as the difference between the judge model's own and other models' scores .
Outcome: The proposed method can assess self-preference bias across large language models . it uses gold judgments as proxies for the ground truth scores of the judge model .
Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning for Enhanced Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge (2026.acl-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing MLLMs are optimized for single-task scenarios and struggle to generalize to diverse contexts.
Approach: They propose a framework that integrates multitask reinforcement learning and generalization capabilities of MLLMs to optimize the judge model across multiple tasks.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms baseline models in judgment consistency and correlation with human preferences.
DART: Leveraging Multi-Agent Disagreement for Tool Recruitment in Multimodal Reasoning (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a key strength of human intelligence is the ability to debate and discuss reasoning with others.
Approach: They propose a multi-agent framework that uses disagreements between visual agents to identify useful visual tools that can resolve inter-agency disagreement.
Outcome: The proposed framework beats the strongest baseline on A-OKVQA and MMMU, respectively.
Persona-judge: Personalized Alignment of Large Language Models via Token-level Self-judgment (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for aligning language models with human preferences rely on reward signals and additional annotated data, limiting their scalability and adaptability to diverse human values.
Approach: They propose a discriminative paradigm that leverages the intrinsic preference judgment capabilities of the model to align language models with human preferences.
Outcome: The proposed model is scalable and efficient, paving the way for more adaptive personalized alignment.
Mediocrity is the key for LLM as a Judge Anchor Selection (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a poor selection of an anchor can dramatically reduce correlation with human rankings . traditional reference-based metrics are often ill-suited for open-ended generation .
Approach: They evaluate 22 different anchors on a Arena-Hard-v2.0 dataset and quantify the effect size of anchor selection.
Outcome: The proposed model is better or worse than all other models, but it is rarely indicative of the relative ranking of the models.
ConciseRL: Conciseness-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Reasoning Models (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models excel at complex tasks by breaking down problems into structured reasoning steps.
Approach: They propose a hyperparameter-free conciseness score to guide models toward generating correct reasoning traces.
Outcome: The proposed method reduces token usage by 31x on simple problems while improving accuracy by 7% on the hardest problems.
MR. Judge: Multimodal Reasoner as a Judge (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Effective reward modeling is especially valuable in reinforcement learning (RLHF) .
Approach: They propose a paradigm for empowering general-purpose MLLMs judges with strong reasoning capabilities by using multiple-choice problem models instead of directly assigning scores.
Outcome: The proposed model surpasses GPT-4o on VL-RewardBench and improves performance on MM-Vet by up to 7.7%.
When in Doubt, Consult: Expert Debate for Sexism Detection via Confidence-Based Routing (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: sexist content on social media is increasingly pervasive, often appearing in subtle, context-dependent forms that evade traditional classification methods.
Approach: They propose a framework that unifies targeted training procedures to regularize supervision to scarce and noisy data with selective reasoning-based inference to handle ambiguous or borderline cases.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms existing approaches across several public benchmarks . it bridges the gap between efficiency and reasoning with a dynamic routing mechanism .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations